Programming

[spudtater]

I have finally joined the 21st century and downloaded the Eclipse SDK for Java development. Oooh, luxury. I don't know why I stuck with xemacs for so long!

---

Also: after worrying about Java generics since Java 5.0 came out, I finally bit the bullet and set to teaching myself how to use them. Result: I had it figured out within about five minutes. Easy!

Non-generic java:

ArrayList a = new ArrayList();
a.add( "the" );
a.add( "quick" );
a.add( "brown" );
a.add( "fox" );
Iterator i = a.iterator();
while( i.hasNext() )
    System.out.println( "Length of string is " + ((String) i.next()).length() );

Which is, for one thing, ugly. (LISPs!) More significantly, it can lead to type conversion errors at runtime, when you'd much prefer to see them at compile time.

Generic java:

ArrayList<String> a = new ArrayList<String>();
a.add( "the" );
a.add( "quick" );
a.add( "brown" );
a.add( "fox" );
Iterator<String> i = a.iterator();
while( i.hasNext() )
    System.out.println( "Length of string is " + i.next().length() );

Which is easy enough to understand — just read ArrayList<String> as "an ArrayList of type String". Iterator<String> means "an Iterator over type String", and so forth.

---

On another note: have been exposed to the dreaded C#, which Microsoft likes to describes as an updated version of C/C++, with a few influences from Visual Basic and Java. Let's take a look at a HelloWorld program in C#:

public class HelloWorld {
    public static void Main( string[] args ) {
        System.Console.WriteLine( "Hello, world" );
    }
}

Hmmm... not fooling anyone there, Billy. It's Java through-and-through, with a few syntactic differences (for example, upper-case method names) just to piss off existing Java programmers. Teh annoy.

Enough about me. How are you?