1. They disagree with the suggestion that the proposals have only been tabled very recently.
2. They disagree with the suggestion that the current version of the legislation implements a three-strikes policy. They have, though, concerns about whether an ISP implementing such a policy (or anything similar) will have to inform their customers clearly enough.
3.Is contract length actually an issue in this case? Seems like a good line to take as far as it goes, but I don't see the relevance.
4. They believe that the current version is worth supporting precisely because it does not involve items such as or similar to a three-strikes policy.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 01:13 am (UTC)2. They disagree with the suggestion that the current version of the legislation implements a three-strikes policy. They have, though, concerns about whether an ISP implementing such a policy (or anything similar) will have to inform their customers clearly enough.
3.Is contract length actually an issue in this case? Seems like a good line to take as far as it goes, but I don't see the relevance.
4. They believe that the current version is worth supporting precisely because it does not involve items such as or similar to a three-strikes policy.