Random stuff I found digging around on the internet. Not at all up-to-date or newsworthy, but I thought I'd share a couple of gems.
First, those Diebold election machines. In November last year, the state of North Carolina asked Diebold to show them the election machine source code (this would prove to the officials that the machine works in the way that Diebold claims it does). Diebold refused to do so, choosing instead to abandon its contract for the entire state — not exactly good for business. Why was the company so desperate to hide the workings of the machines from the government?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/30/diebold_hides_source/
And in December, computer scientists showed that anybody with access to the election machine's memory card, a computer and a little knowhow could rig the vote — by subtracting votes from one candidate and adding them to the other — because the data was held on the card in a completely unencrypted form.
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,69893,00.html
And somewhat surprisingly, Fox news got into the action, with their claim that a chimp could hack an election machine. (Insert Bush/chimp joke here):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133214,00.html
Now, some anti-Bush videos. These were from the 2004 campaign, but are still floating around on t'Internet. The first two use bits of Bush's own speeches against him:
http://www.moveon.org/bushin30seconds/150/view.html?ad_id=3011
http://www.moveon.org/bushin30seconds/150/view.html?ad_id=1515
The second is funny if you know a little about Bush; specifically, his business track record.
http://www.moveon.org/bushin30seconds/150/view.html?ad_id=1840
Finally, a current story which is rather worrying: CIA is wiretapping ABC news.
Oh, and the reader comments: very scary. Insane-type scary.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/federal_source_.html
First, those Diebold election machines. In November last year, the state of North Carolina asked Diebold to show them the election machine source code (this would prove to the officials that the machine works in the way that Diebold claims it does). Diebold refused to do so, choosing instead to abandon its contract for the entire state — not exactly good for business. Why was the company so desperate to hide the workings of the machines from the government?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/30/diebold_hides_source/
And in December, computer scientists showed that anybody with access to the election machine's memory card, a computer and a little knowhow could rig the vote — by subtracting votes from one candidate and adding them to the other — because the data was held on the card in a completely unencrypted form.
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,69893,00.html
And somewhat surprisingly, Fox news got into the action, with their claim that a chimp could hack an election machine. (Insert Bush/chimp joke here):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133214,00.html
Now, some anti-Bush videos. These were from the 2004 campaign, but are still floating around on t'Internet. The first two use bits of Bush's own speeches against him:
http://www.moveon.org/bushin30seconds/150/view.html?ad_id=3011
http://www.moveon.org/bushin30seconds/150/view.html?ad_id=1515
The second is funny if you know a little about Bush; specifically, his business track record.
http://www.moveon.org/bushin30seconds/150/view.html?ad_id=1840
Finally, a current story which is rather worrying: CIA is wiretapping ABC news.
Oh, and the reader comments: very scary. Insane-type scary.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/federal_source_.html
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Don't know about you, but I feel a bit (a bit!) better now. It's not that so many people are cretins, it's that they're being paid to act like cretins. This is insidious and evil, but at least it can be stopped.
I think there's also a certain truth to this comment: