![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Oh, wow! My post from last May, on "The Holy Grail is a Dragon Bloodline", picked up a response, supposedly from the original author of the piece. (I can only assume that somebody else edits his articles for grammar and punctuation, though.)
We love teh intarwebs.
(I may have to start signing off as "butza brain".) 8^)
We love teh intarwebs.
(I may have to start signing off as "butza brain".) 8^)
Tags:
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
*snigger*
From:
no subject
No evidence of that cited, I notice. What link, anyway?
Has the relevant chapter been dropped, by the way? I can't see any trace of it now.
From:
no subject
I get a wikipedia hit with:
...so he's not completely fabricating things from whole cloth. (Instead he appears to be attempting to weave a tapestry entirely out of clutched straws...) 8^)
Yeah, looks like the chapter's been taken down. Wish I'd taken a copy of it; it was good reading. Still, have got the most mind-boggling bits saved.
From:
no subject
It's likely that a fair number of the data are genuine or plausible - or at least not entirely made up - but that the supposed connections are all wildly implausible. Sometimes this is just eccentricity, but sometimes it's actually some kind of thought disorder. I have a friend who wrote a book like that once. Lovely bloke, but he hasn't been out of hospital much for years.
From:
no subject
I would have presumed some flavour of paranoid schizophrenia, but then everything I know about psychiatry I learned from TV.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject