Instead of a bulb in our kitchen, we have an array of halogen downlighters. This is a nuisance, because they are always blowing and having to be replaced. So this month I went on to yourwelcome.co.uk and bought a selection of energy-saving bulbs. I plumped for a classic compact fluorescent ("energy saving") bulb, a faster-activating cold cathode version, and, with some trepidation, an LED-based lamp.
Today I plugged them all in, and compared them:
| Regent high power CFL energy saving lamp | Your Lightbulbs warm white cold cathode bulb | EnviroLight medium power amber white LED bulb | |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Predicted working life (hours) | 8,000 | 10,000 | 36,500 |
| Cost (approx) | £7 | £6 | £16 |
| Power | 11W | 7W | 3W |
| Brightness | ★★★★★ (5*) | ★★☆☆☆ (2*) | ★★★☆☆ (3*) |
| Warm-up time | ★★☆☆☆ (2*) | ★★★★☆ (4*) | ★★★★★ (5*) |
| Colour | ★★★★★ (5*) | ★★☆☆☆ (2*) | ★★★★☆ (4*) |
(Note that there's one other consideration, and that is form-factor. I haven't included it in the table because either your fitting can accommodate any height of bulb — in which case it doesn't matter which one you go for — or it can't, in which case your choices are limited to classic halogens, or probably the LED version, which is about 5mm taller.)
(Btw, let me know if you can't see my unicode stars in the table above.)
Compact fluorescent light
This was a bit of a monster, and required a bit of wiggling to get into the fitting. On turning on it displayed the usual CFL disadvantage: a snail-like warm-up time. Its warmed up eventually from a deep amber to an attractive yellow-white. This was the only bulb claiming 50W equivalency, and happily, it easily achieves it.
Cold cathode light
This light promised a faster warm-up than the CFL, and it does deliver on that front at least — it's perhaps twice as fast to warm-up. The big disappointment of this bulb is the colour: when I went looking for "green" lighting, this wasn't what I had in mind! The light it cast was somewhat sickly-looking — not helped, I suppose, by the green shade that the kitchen is currently painted. The bulb promises 30–40W equivalency, but seems to fall short of that.
This doesn't mean that cold-cathode technology is neccessarily inherently bad — just don't get this brand!
LED light
I almost didn't buy this light, because of both its cost and the bad reputation that LED house lights have. Indeed, the tone of this light is significantly more whitish than an incandescent, but not so far as to exhibit that horrible blueish "trendy bar" tint. It suits a kitchen light perfectly. The face is translucent, which disguises the clustered look of some LED lights. The brightness is impressive — easily 35W equivalent, and no warm-up period required.
So, somewhat to my own suprise, I end up recommending spending the extra money and getting the LED lights. Don't be tempted to cut costs, though — most of the cheaper LED lights are no good for anything except mood lighting.
(Another option would be to mix LED and CFL lights — they complement each other quite nicely.)



From:
no subject
Nope.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
The other led advantage is most are dimmable
From:
no subject
Actually, the main reason I didn't go for one like this is the appearance — not sure I like the 'metal grill' effect around the outside. YMMV. That aside, it would be interesting to compare against the one I bought.
From:
no subject