spudtater: (Default)
( Jun. 28th, 2005 10:44 am)
I am sickeningly cheerful today. I do not know why this is.
I have a theory that it involves sunlight, skin, and vitamin D.
If I get too bad, somebody had better give me a good slapping around.

P.S. Any thoughts on OpenID, anybody?

Here's a short story I wrote during the summer. I originally wrote it for [livejournal.com profile] mistersleepless's site, but he didn't run it (he had a load of submissions; maybe he just overlooked mine or something...)   8^P   8^)

I've rewritten it a touch now that I don't have to stick to under 200 words. It's still blink-and-you've-missed-it short, though. Hopefully just enough to get you thinking.

The Grandfather Paradox )
spudtater: (Default)
( Aug. 27th, 2004 04:58 pm)
You are Musa Ibrahim.  YOU ARE AN ACCOUNTANT WITH THE NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORP. YOU WISH TO REMIT $21 MILLION TO MY COMPANY FOR SAFEKEEPING.  YOU ENJOY BICYCLING AND TYPING IN ALL-CAPS.
Which Nigerian spammer are You?
Tags:
spudtater: (Default)
( Jun. 5th, 2004 03:00 am)
Just a quickie:
Have been playing with cgi recently, which kinda led (as these things do) into making my own simple message board. It's completely pointless, but I'm proud of it. (Particularly since it seems to be faaaiiirly robust... you can use some HTML, but not enough to break the board. Hopefully.)

http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s0092605/board/post.html
spudtater: (Default)
( Jun. 3rd, 2004 04:50 pm)

I have now got a genetic algorithm working on my grammer-learner. It's got through about ten generations of rules so far. Training it is dull work for one person; I hope to learn how to do web interfaces and get a whole bunch of people working on it eventually...

But anyway, look at some of the silliness it's come up with by now:

  • donkey wanker
  • me have monkey
  • monkey pirate I look brown
  • got some chicken
  • use elvis
  • hello elvis
  • do me

I'm going to start using 'donkey wanker' as an insult.    8^)

I am teaching my computer to learn rules of grammer automagically. Right now it just generates grammer rules randomly, leading to sentences made up of meaningless strings of words. But that's funny in its own way. And anyway, it already makes as much sense as I usually do.

For my initial bag of words I'm using a bunch of Weebl & Bob themed words. Observe:

  • eating yes ones as chicken head you does no you bull there
  • pie
  • coconuts brown look small small cheese moon does a
  • no soup
  • go eating back to
  • big no you bull
  • coconuts brown look small small there coconuts
  • eating yes ones mysterious chicken head you no you there
  • not coconuts
  • pirate ninja use head rain is use
  • coconuts brown look small small there got your lee not spoon eat me come ninja brown a use coconuts got your lee not at not mmm use coconuts brown look small small there a spoon eat me come ninja brown a mysterious coconuts got your lee not weebl quick got your lee not coconuts much does no you bull your to does row use wanker dog got your lee not for why made wanker donkey out big hello monkey mat a us me fox made us why coconuts got chicken dog wanker got your lee not mysterious got your lee not eating wanker in

I was thinking about Conway's Game of Life (look it up! now!) once again, thinking about patterns that generate infinite sequences of pattern, when I wondered: "is there a Conway pattern that will generate everything possible in the Conway universe? I thought of the Turing-completeness of the game of life, and the answer struck me.

The proof: yes there is! )

This is mind-blowing! If the universe follows a finite and deterministic set of laws like the Game of Life does, and is Turing complete, then it is possible, but not neccessary that every possible finite structure will be created, every possible thought will occur to somebody, every possible book will be written, every possible LJ post posted, that Alex will exist in infinitely many variations infinitely many times. It all depends on the initial configuration. Does God exist? Was this his plan? Is this the true translation of "let there be light"? Or is he nonexistent? Or incompetent?

Under current models of the universe, it is unlikely that this is the case. For the universe to be Turing complete, it would seem to require infinite amounts of energy, matter and time, which doesn't appear to be true. Mind you, perhaps we could somehow create things smaller and smaller; entire worlds the size of the head of a pin, which would create smaller worlds, ad infinitum (N.B. each world would also have to operate at twice the speed of the last). Then it would be possible and we can rejoice in the prospect of infinite variety in all things. Or despair. 8^)

I've finally got a competition-ready version of my judo-playing robot finished! Yay! She's named Kirika, and she's going to be fighting other robots at http://cyberboticspc1.epfl.ch/contest/index.php starting at 1:00 tomorrow. Watch her fight and stand in awe of my fearsome AI-programming prowess! (Maybe.)
.

Profile

spudtater: (Default)
spudtater

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags